08-17-2018, 04:55 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-17-2018, 04:58 PM by Mattias Westlund.)
OK, did a bit of research and it's no longer a mystery why the M-GS64/SC-88 sounds far better than what one might expect given the reputation of Sound Canvas units, at least in musician circles.
Not only is the difference between 3MB and 8MB a big deal in itself, the M-GS64/SC-88 apparently uses some sort of sample compression and its actual ROM size is 16MB. That's a whole friggin' lot for 1994, considering that the Proteus 2000 which came out five years later and was a state-of-the-art synth had a 32MB ROM. Twice the size, yes, but not really a whole lot more for five years of technical development. Maybe it's an apples and pears comparison since I have no idea what Roland was doing at the time, but the Proteus 2000 is a pretty iconic unit that I'm personally familiar with.
Quote:The total Sound Canvas [SC-55] patch set is 3MB in size, 1MB of which is probably dedicated to the MT-32 tones
Quote:The SC-88's 8 Mbyte wave memory is equivalent to 16 Mbytes in a 16-bit
linear format, allowing the SC-88 to offer an immense number of sounds
that include General MIDI System Level 1 and the Roland GS Format
sounds.
Not only is the difference between 3MB and 8MB a big deal in itself, the M-GS64/SC-88 apparently uses some sort of sample compression and its actual ROM size is 16MB. That's a whole friggin' lot for 1994, considering that the Proteus 2000 which came out five years later and was a state-of-the-art synth had a 32MB ROM. Twice the size, yes, but not really a whole lot more for five years of technical development. Maybe it's an apples and pears comparison since I have no idea what Roland was doing at the time, but the Proteus 2000 is a pretty iconic unit that I'm personally familiar with.