01-04-2021, 09:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-04-2021, 09:38 PM by Mattias Westlund.)
OK, I've experimented with your method and compared it to ITDPanner. It's hard to do any scientifically valid A/B-ing since ITDPanner calculates the amount of delay automatically when you turn the balance knob, whereas with the Channel Time Delayer you need to enter the values manually and sort of guesstimate the right amount. But I would hazard that for all intents and purposes both methods are basically the same, and yields nearly identical results. I think I'm sticking with ITDPanner since it spares me the guesswork, but I definitely think you have a great sounding mix going on there, so I see no reason you should change what you're already doing
