Scoring Central
Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - Printable Version

+- Scoring Central (http://scoringcentral.mattiaswestlund.net)
+-- Forum: Technology (http://scoringcentral.mattiaswestlund.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Forum: Samples & Sample libraries (http://scoringcentral.mattiaswestlund.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Thread: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts (/showthread.php?tid=155)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5


RE: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - Michael Willis - 01-03-2017

(01-03-2017, 01:34 AM)Mattias Westlund Wrote: Maybe we should approach a desperate sample developer (like, obviously, Sonivox) about doing a crowdfunding campaign to release their libs into the public domain, or at least under some non-copyrighted license?

I mean, if they're willing to sell their stuff for $1...

I can't tell if you're joking, but seriously, you might be on to something... I would pitch in some money, and to spread the word we could just start here and have people reach out to other forums and communities with a link to the crowd fund campaign.


RE: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - Mattias Westlund - 01-03-2017

(01-03-2017, 04:14 AM)Michael Willis Wrote: I can't tell if you're joking, but seriously, you might be on to something... I would pitch in some money, and to spread the word we could just start here and have people reach out to other forums and communities with a link to the crowd fund campaign.

I was actually being serious. Though how successful such a venture might be I have no idea.


RE: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - Michael Willis - 01-03-2017

(01-03-2017, 01:21 PM)Mattias Westlund Wrote: I was actually being serious. Though how successful such a venture might be I have no idea.

The fact that they seem desperate to squeeze it for what little money they can get would seem to indicate that they may take the bait of us crowdfunding a public domain release.


RE: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - Mattias Westlund - 01-03-2017

What's really odd though is that they've chosen to go with a proprietary sample player instead of just releasing the libraries in Kontakt format. Fairly priced, I think they would have made a lot more money that way.


RE: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - goldglob - 01-09-2017

(12-30-2016, 05:38 PM)Mattias Westlund Wrote: I've finally had some time to experiment more with the Sonivox Orchestral Companion libs that I've gotten my mitts on lately, i.e. Strings, Brass and Woodwinds.

And what can I say. I love the sound of these samples (YMMV of course, as I have a weird fetish for older orchestral libs, and I have some experience with Sonivox's stuff from the M-Audio-branded ProSessions discs from years ago) and it's simply a damn shame that the player frontend is such a clunky, buggy mess. I mean what the hell were they thinking?
  • It has no disk streaming, which forces me to use up almost half of my 16GB of RAM for just loading all the basic sections. I'm guessing that if I added all solo instruments as well, I'd have no RAM left for loading anything else. But who needs percussion, harp, piano, choirs and stuff anyway, right?
  • The plugins are monotimbral, so you'll need a separate instance for every section and instrument.
  • There's an awful lot of unsightly clicking and crackling going on, for no apparent reason.
  • The velocity response feels off and there's no way to adjust it from within the plugins.
  • The Transpose knob doesn't actually transpose -- it pitch shifts the patches!
  • The keyswitches are fixed at the -1 octave and can't be edited, which means you'll need an 88 key controller (if even that helps) to be able to switch articulations while playing in the high register.
  • The release tails can't be switched off.
  • It has synth features like amp, pitch and filter LFO's and a built in delay and chorus -- but no potentially useful synth features like pitch envelope, legato mode and glide.
And... probably more. Just thinking of all these problems makes me sad so I'll stop there.

This is some really pathetic stuff. The samples sound great but the way they're packaged just makes the whole suite borderline useless for anyone except maybe people looking for a quick "orchestra synth" type of instrument for their pop songs. Which is really too bad, as this could have been a great collection of affordable orchestral VI's.

Up until now I was considering ripping the notes manually from the scrambled plugins (strings & winds) but I honestly don't know if it's worth the trouble even trying. With all the crackling going on it's likely a lost cause. I'm going to cut my losses and just map what I might need from the brass as SFZ and/or TX and then wash my hands of this mess.

Well said Mattias, a damn shame indeed.
I've found that he mod wheel seems to work only on the violin espressivo patch (the site says "Keyboard mod wheel swells volume for intense dynamics")
Also, when this patch is chosen, the spiccato articulation button actuates, even though the sound is still sustain.

Googling generally tells me that contacting support is pretty useless.

I can see that I could achieve dynamics expression by manually assigning cc1 or cc11 to volume. I'm a bit of a midi newbie..could I ask you a question...with the violin espressivo patch when I move the (working) mod wheel...I can't see the vol knob or any other parameters moving..what would be changing here? Is the mod wheel changing velocity..or is it internally changing the vol but without moving the knob?

Yep, only set me back a pound, but as by all accounts the wind and brass have the same problems I'm not enticed to get their Premier collection upgrade.


RE: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - Otto Halmén - 01-10-2017

I've read people argue for custom romplers over Kontakt due to the fact that Kontakt is easy to pirate and that it comes with batch .wav exporting of sample libraries. Still, SONiVOX used to have these in Gigastudio format, so this probably wasn't their exact reasoning.

It's such a waste of potential. I wonder if this is caused by some kind of design by committee or excessive compartmentalization of development tasks. Would have loved to use the strings.

Welcome aboard, goldglob! Smile


RE: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - Nayrb - 01-11-2017

(01-09-2017, 02:20 PM)goldglob Wrote: when I move the (working) mod wheel...I can't see the vol knob or any other parameters moving..what would be changing here? Is the mod wheel changing velocity..or is it internally changing the vol but without moving the knob?

Greets goldglob!

The dynamics (modwheel) parameter crossfades between the velocity layers, nothing is happening to the master volume. So you're right, it's changing velocity. Or it would be if the Orchestral Companion stuff actually functioned!


RE: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - goldglob - 01-11-2017

(01-11-2017, 01:32 AM)Nayrb Wrote:
(01-09-2017, 02:20 PM)goldglob Wrote: when I move the (working) mod wheel...I can't see the vol knob or any other parameters moving..what would be changing here? Is the mod wheel changing velocity..or is it internally changing the vol but without moving the knob?

Greets goldglob!

The dynamics (modwheel) parameter crossfades between the velocity layers, nothing is happening to the master volume. So you're right, it's changing velocity. Or it would be if the Orchestral Companion stuff actually functioned!
Thanks for your reply. OK, found this on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A69JQGHwUpo
The guy points out that cc11 (expression) works.
I plugged in my expression pedal and found that it works on all patches, not just the violins espressivo. Here again, I can't see vol knob or any other parameters moving.
So would this be crossfading velocity layers in the way you have described for how the mod wheel should be working?
Would there be a way to assign my mod wheel to cc11? I'm just stabbing in the dark here...I'm not really familiar with all this.


RE: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - Mattias Westlund - 01-11-2017

(01-11-2017, 04:14 AM)goldglob Wrote: Would there be a way to assign my mod wheel to cc11? I'm just stabbing in the dark here...I'm not really familiar with all this.

There's a couple of ways if the plugin itself won't let you do it.

1) Consult your midi controller manual, sometimes you can easily remap hardware functions.

2) Use a midi plugin that translates between midi CC# messages. IIRC pizmidi has one.

It might even be possible that your DAW lets you do thise natively, I seem to remember that Cubase has some such function. It's been years though so I can't be any more specific than that.


RE: Sonivox Orchestral Companion thoughts - goldglob - 01-11-2017

(01-11-2017, 06:43 PM)Mattias Westlund Wrote:
(01-11-2017, 04:14 AM)goldglob Wrote: Would there be a way to assign my mod wheel to cc11? I'm just stabbing in the dark here...I'm not really familiar with all this.

There's a couple of ways if the plugin itself won't let you do it.

1) Consult your midi controller manual, sometimes you can easily remap hardware functions.

2) Use a midi plugin that translates between midi CC# messages. IIRC pizmidi has one.

It might even be possible that your DAW lets you do thise natively, I seem to remember that Cubase has some such function. It's been years though so I can't be any more specific than that.

Thankyou. I'm using REAPER and found a JS plugin that does it. So looks like either cc1 (with translate to cc11) or cc11 itself can be used for dynamics on all patches. That's something I guess. That leaves the silly bug: when violin espressivo patch is chosen, the spiccato articulation button actuates, even though the sound is still sustain..just annoying, like the first and only ding in a brand new guitar!